Inflammatory Ear Disease
| Procedure | Appropriateness Category | Relative Radiation Level |
| Radiography skull | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢ |
| MRI head and internal auditory canal with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| MRI head and internal auditory canal without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| MRI head and internal auditory canal without IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| MRI head with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| MRI head without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| MRI head without IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| CT head with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| CT head without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| CT head without IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| CT temporal bone with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| CT temporal bone without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| CT temporal bone without IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| Procedure | Appropriateness Category | Relative Radiation Level |
| MRI head and internal auditory canal without and with IV contrast | Usually Appropriate | O |
| CT temporal bone with IV contrast | Usually Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| MRI head without and with IV contrast | May Be Appropriate | O |
| CT temporal bone without IV contrast | May Be Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| WBC scan with SPECT or SPECT/CT skull base | May Be Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| Radiography skull | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢ |
| MRI head and internal auditory canal with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| MRI head and internal auditory canal without IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| MRI head with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| MRI head without IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| CT head and neck with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| CT head and neck without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| CT head and neck without IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| CT head with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| CT head without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| CT head without IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| CT temporal bone without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| Procedure | Appropriateness Category | Relative Radiation Level |
| Radiography skull | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢ |
| MRI head and internal auditory canal with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| MRI head and internal auditory canal without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| MRI head and internal auditory canal without IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| MRI head with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| MRI head without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| MRI head without IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| CT head with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| CT head without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| CT head without IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| CT temporal bone with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| CT temporal bone without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| CT temporal bone without IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| Procedure | Appropriateness Category | Relative Radiation Level |
| MRI head and internal auditory canal without and with IV contrast | Usually Appropriate | O |
| CT temporal bone with IV contrast | Usually Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| CTV head with IV contrast | Usually Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| MRV head with IV contrast | May Be Appropriate | O |
| MRV head without IV contrast | May Be Appropriate | O |
| CT temporal bone without IV contrast | May Be Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| Radiography skull | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢ |
| MRI head and internal auditory canal with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| MRI head and internal auditory canal without IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| MRI head with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| MRI head without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| MRI head without IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| MRV head without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| CT head with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| CT head without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| CT head without IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| CT temporal bone without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| CTV head and neck with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| WBC scan with SPECT or SPECT/CT skull base | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| Procedure | Appropriateness Category | Relative Radiation Level |
| MRI head and internal auditory canal without and with IV contrast | Usually Appropriate | O |
| CT temporal bone without IV contrast | Usually Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| Radiography skull | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢ |
| MRI head and internal auditory canal with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| MRI head and internal auditory canal without IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| MRI head with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| MRI head without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| MRI head without IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| CT head with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| CT head without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| CT head without IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| CT temporal bone with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| CT temporal bone without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| Procedure | Appropriateness Category | Relative Radiation Level |
| MRI head and internal auditory canal without and with IV contrast | Usually Appropriate | O |
| CT temporal bone without IV contrast | Usually Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| Radiography skull | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢ |
| MRI head and internal auditory canal with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| MRI head and internal auditory canal without IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| MRI head with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| MRI head without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| MRI head without IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| CT head with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| CT head without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| CT head without IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| CT temporal bone with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| CT temporal bone without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
Initial imaging is defined as imaging at the beginning of the care episode for the medical condition defined by the variant. More than one procedure can be considered usually appropriate in the initial imaging evaluation when:
- There are procedures that are equivalent alternatives (i.e., only one procedure will be ordered to provide the clinical information to effectively manage the patient’s care)
OR
- There are complementary procedures (i.e., more than one procedure is ordered as a set or simultaneously wherein each procedure provides unique clinical information to effectively manage the patient’s care).
A. CT head with IV contrast
B. CT head without and with IV contrast
C. CT head without IV contrast
D. CT temporal bone with IV contrast
E. CT temporal bone without and with IV contrast
F. CT temporal bone without IV contrast
G. MRI head and internal auditory canal with IV contrast
H. MRI head and internal auditory canal without and with IV contrast
I. MRI head and internal auditory canal without IV contrast
J. MRI head with IV contrast
K. MRI head without and with IV contrast
L. MRI head without IV contrast
M. Radiography skull
A. CT head and neck with IV contrast
B. CT head and neck without and with IV contrast
C. CT head and neck without IV contrast
D. CT head with IV contrast
E. CT head without and with IV contrast
F. CT head without IV contrast
G. CT temporal bone with IV contrast
H. CT temporal bone without and with IV contrast
I. CT temporal bone without IV contrast
J. MRI head and internal auditory canal with IV contrast
K. MRI head and internal auditory canal without and with IV contrast
L. MRI head and internal auditory canal without IV contrast
M. MRI head with IV contrast
N. MRI head without and with IV contrast
O. MRI head without IV contrast
P. Radiography skull
Q. WBC scan with SPECT or SPECT/CT skull base
A. CT head with IV contrast
B. CT head without and with IV contrast
C. CT temporal bone with IV contrast
D. CT temporal bone without and with IV contrast
E. CT temporal bone without IV contrast
F. MRI head and internal auditory canal with IV contrast
G. MRI head and internal auditory canal without and with IV contrast
H. MRI head and internal auditory canal without IV contrast
I. MRI head with IV contrast
J. MRI head without and with IV contrast
K. MRI head without IV contrast
L. Radiography skull
A. CT head with IV contrast
B. CT head without and with IV contrast
C. CT head without IV contrast
D. CT temporal bone with IV contrast
E. CT temporal bone without and with IV contrast
F. CT temporal bone without IV contrast
G. CTV head and neck with IV contrast
H. CTV head with IV contrast
I. MRI head and internal auditory canal with IV contrast
J. MRI head and internal auditory canal without and with IV contrast
K. MRI head and internal auditory canal without IV contrast
L. MRI head with IV contrast
M. MRI head without and with IV contrast
N. MRI head without IV contrast
O. MRV head with IV contrast
P. MRV head without and with IV contrast
Q. MRV head without IV contrast
R. Radiography skull
S. WBC scan with SPECT or SPECT/CT skull base
A. CT head with IV contrast
B. CT head without and with IV contrast
C. CT head without IV contrast
D. CT temporal bone with IV contrast
E. CT temporal bone without and with IV contrast
F. CT temporal bone without IV contrast
G. MRI head and internal auditory canal with IV contrast
H. MRI head and internal auditory canal without and with IV contrast
I. MRI head and internal auditory canal without IV contrast
J. MRI head with IV contrast
K. MRI head without and with IV contrast
L. MRI head without IV contrast
M. Radiography skull
A. CT head with IV contrast
B. CT head without and with IV contrast
C. CT head without IV contrast
D. CT temporal bone with IV contrast
E. CT temporal bone without and with IV contrast
F. CT temporal bone without IV contrast
G. MRI head and internal auditory canal with IV contrast
H. MRI head and internal auditory canal without and with IV contrast
I. MRI head and internal auditory canal without IV contrast
J. MRI head with IV contrast
K. MRI head without and with IV contrast
L. MRI head without IV contrast
M. Radiography skull
The evidence table, literature search, and appendix for this topic are available at https://acsearch.acr.org/list. The appendix includes the strength of evidence assessment and the final rating round tabulations for each recommendation.
For additional information on the Appropriateness Criteria methodology and other supporting documents, please go to the ACR website at https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Clinical-Tools-and-Reference/Appropriateness-Criteria.
The ACR acknowledges the limitations in applying inclusive language when citing research studies that predates the use of the current understanding of language inclusive of diversity in sex, intersex, gender, and gender-diverse people. The data variables regarding sex and gender used in the cited literature will not be changed. However, this guideline will use the terminology and definitions as proposed by the National Institutes of Health.
|
Appropriateness Category Name |
Appropriateness Rating |
Appropriateness Category Definition |
|
Usually Appropriate |
7, 8, or 9 |
The imaging procedure or treatment is indicated in the specified clinical scenarios at a favorable risk-benefit ratio for patients. |
|
May Be Appropriate |
4, 5, or 6 |
The imaging procedure or treatment may be indicated in the specified clinical scenarios as an alternative to imaging procedures or treatments with a more favorable risk-benefit ratio, or the risk-benefit ratio for patients is equivocal. |
|
May Be Appropriate (Disagreement) |
5 |
The individual ratings are too dispersed from the panel median. The different label provides transparency regarding the panel’s recommendation. “May be appropriate” is the rating category and a rating of 5 is assigned. |
|
Usually Not Appropriate |
1, 2, or 3 |
The imaging procedure or treatment is unlikely to be indicated in the specified clinical scenarios, or the risk-benefit ratio for patients is likely to be unfavorable. |
Potential adverse health effects associated with radiation exposure are an important factor to consider when selecting the appropriate imaging procedure. Because there is a wide range of radiation exposures associated with different diagnostic procedures, a relative radiation level (RRL) indication has been included for each imaging examination. The RRLs are based on effective dose, which is a radiation dose quantity that is used to estimate population total radiation risk associated with an imaging procedure. Patients in the pediatric age group are at inherently higher risk from exposure, because of both organ sensitivity and longer life expectancy (relevant to the long latency that appears to accompany radiation exposure). For these reasons, the RRL dose estimate ranges for pediatric examinations are lower as compared with those specified for adults (see Table below). Additional information regarding radiation dose assessment for imaging examinations can be found in the ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Radiation Dose Assessment Introduction document.
|
Relative Radiation Level Designations |
||
|
Relative Radiation Level* |
Adult Effective Dose Estimate Range |
Pediatric Effective Dose Estimate Range |
|
O |
0 mSv |
0 mSv |
|
☢ |
<0.1 mSv |
<0.03 mSv |
|
☢☢ |
0.1-1 mSv |
0.03-0.3 mSv |
|
☢☢☢ |
1-10 mSv |
0.3-3 mSv |
|
☢☢☢☢ |
10-30 mSv |
3-10 mSv |
|
☢☢☢☢☢ |
30-100 mSv |
10-30 mSv |
|
*RRL assignments for some of the examinations cannot be made, because the actual patient doses in these procedures vary as a function of a number of factors (e.g., region of the body exposed to ionizing radiation, the imaging guidance that is used). The RRLs for these examinations are designated as “Varies.” |
||
| 1. | Wiegand S, Berner R, Schneider A, Lundershausen E, Dietz A. Otitis Externa. [Review]. Deutsches Arzteblatt International. 116(13):224-234, 2019 03 29. | |
| 2. | Spielmann PM, Yu R, Neeff M. Skull base osteomyelitis: current microbiology and management. J Laryngol Otol. 127 Suppl 1:S8-12, 2013 Jan. | |
| 3. | Trevino Gonzalez JL, Reyes Suarez LL, Hernandez de Leon JE. Malignant otitis externa: An updated review. [Review]. American Journal of Otolaryngology. 42(2):102894, 2021 Mar-Apr. | |
| 4. | Chawdhary G, Pankhania M, Douglas S, Bottrill I. Current management of necrotising otitis externa in the UK: survey of 221 UK otolaryngologists. Acta Oto-Laryngologica. 137(8):818-822, 2017 Aug. | |
| 5. | Pont E, Mazon M. Indications and radiological findings of acute otitis media and its complications. Acta Otorrinolaringologica Espanola. 68(1):29-37, 2017 Jan - Feb. | |
| 6. | Luntz M, Bartal K, Brodsky A, Shihada R. Acute mastoiditis: the role of imaging for identifying intracranial complications. Laryngoscope. 122(12):2813-7, 2012 Dec. | |
| 7. | Marom T, Roth Y, Boaz M, et al. Acute Mastoiditis in Children: Necessity and Timing of Imaging. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 35(1):30-4, 2016 Jan. | |
| 8. | Mather M, Powell S, Yates PD, Powell J. Acute mastoiditis in children: contemporary opportunities and challenges. Journal of Laryngology & Otology. 134(5):434-439, 2020 May. | |
| 9. | Saat R, Kurdo G, Brandstack N, Laulajainen-Hongisto A, Jero J, Markkola A. A New Classification System is Helpful in Diagnosing Intracranial Complications of Acute Mastoiditis in CT. Clin Neuroradiol. 28(4):523-528, 2018 Dec. | |
| 10. | Paltura C, Can TS, Yilmaz BK, Dinc ME, Develioglu ON, Kulekci M. Eustachian tube diameter: Is it associated with chronic otitis media development?. Am J Otolaryngol. 38(4):414-416, 2017 Jul - Aug. | |
| 11. | Yamashita K, Yoshiura T, Hiwatashi A, et al. Contributing factors in the pathogenesis of acquired cholesteatoma: size analysis based on MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 196(5):1172-5, 2011 May. | |
| 12. | Smith ME, Hardman JC, Mehta N, et al. Acute otitis externa: Consensus definition, diagnostic criteria and core outcome set development. PLoS ONE [Electronic Resource]. 16(5):e0251395, 2021. | |
| 13. | Rosenfeld RM, Schwartz SR, Cannon CR, et al. Clinical practice guideline: acute otitis externa. [Review]. Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery. 150(1 Suppl):S1-S24, 2014 Feb. | |
| 14. | Spielmann PM, McKean S, White RD, Hussain SS. Surgical management of external auditory canal lesions. Journal of Laryngology & Otology. 127(3):246-51, 2013 Mar. | |
| 15. | Cooper T, Hildrew D, McAfee JS, McCall AA, Branstetter BF 4th, Hirsch BE. Imaging in the Diagnosis and Management of Necrotizing Otitis Externa: A Survey of Practice Patterns. Otol Neurotol. 39(5):597-601, 2018 06. | |
| 16. | Lambor DV, Das CP, Goel HC, Tiwari M, Lambor SD, Fegade MV. Necrotising otitis externa: clinical profile and management protocol. J Laryngol Otol. 127(11):1071-7, 2013 Nov. | |
| 17. | Bhat V, Aziz A, Bhandary SK, Aroor R, Kamath P SD, Saldanha M. Malignant Otitis Externa - A Retrospective Study of 15 Patients Treated in a Tertiary Healthcare Center. The Journal of International Advanced Otology. 11(1):72-6, 2015 Apr. | |
| 18. | Bock K, Ovesen T. Optimised diagnosis and treatment of necrotizing external otitis is warranted. Dan Med Bull. 58(7):A4292, 2011 Jul. | |
| 19. | Auinger AB, Dahm V, Stanisz I, Schwarz-Nemec U, Arnoldner C. The challenging diagnosis and follow-up of skull base osteomyelitis in clinical practice. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 278(12):4681-4688, 2021 Dec. | |
| 20. | Kamalden TMIT, Misron K. A 10-year review of malignant otitis externa: a new insight. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 279(6):2837-2844, 2022 Jun. | |
| 21. | Hodgson SH, Sinclair VJ, Arwyn-Jones J, et al. Characteristics, management and outcome of a large necrotising otitis externa case series: need for standardised case definition. J Laryngol Otol. 136(7):604-610, 2022 Jul. | |
| 22. | Lim JWJ, Hill FCE, Kerr S, Briggs R, McLean T. Diagnostic approach to patients at risk of otogenic skull base osteomyelitis. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh). 142(3-4):272-279, 2022 Mar-Apr. | |
| 23. | Balakrishnan R, Dalakoti P, Nayak DR, Pujary K, Singh R, Kumar R. Efficacy of HRCT Imaging vs SPECT/CT Scans in the Staging of Malignant External Otitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 161(2):336-342, 2019 08. | |
| 24. | Lau K, Scotta G, Wu K, Kabuli MAK, Watson G. A review of thirty-nine patients diagnosed with necrotising otitis externa over three years: Is CT imaging for diagnosis sufficient?. Clin Otolaryngol. 45(3):414-418, 2020 05. | |
| 25. | Hopkins ME, Bennett A, Henderson N, MacSween KF, Baring D, Sutherland R. A retrospective review and multi-specialty, evidence-based guideline for the management of necrotising otitis externa. [Review]. J Laryngol Otol. 134(6):487-492, 2020 Jun. | |
| 26. | Peled C, Novoa R, El-Saied S, Sadeh R, Novack V, Kaplan DM. Computer tomography findings in necrotizing otitis externa based on the offending pathogens. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 278(12):4707-4713, 2021 Dec. | |
| 27. | Lieberthal AS, Carroll AE, Chonmaitree T, et al. The diagnosis and management of acute otitis media. Pediatrics. 131(3):e964-99, 2013 Mar. | |
| 28. | Khan HA. Necrotising Otitis Externa: A Review of Imaging Modalities. [Review]. Cureus. 13(12):e20675, 2021 Dec. | |
| 29. | Chesney J, Black A, Choo D. What is the best practice for acute mastoiditis in children?. [Review]. Laryngoscope. 124(5):1057-8, 2014 May. | |
| 30. | Mattos JL, Colman KL, Casselbrant ML, Chi DH. Intratemporal and intracranial complications of acute otitis media in a pediatric population. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology. 78(12):2161-4, 2014 Dec. | |
| 31. | Ovnat Tamir S, Shemesh S, Oron Y, Marom T. Acute otitis media guidelines in selected developed and developing countries: uniformity and diversity. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 102(5):450-457, 2017 05. | |
| 32. | Palma S, Bovo R, Benatti A, et al. Mastoiditis in adults: a 19-year retrospective study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 271(5):925-31, 2014 May. | |
| 33. | Venekamp RP, Schilder AGM, van den Heuvel M, Hay AD. Acute otitis media in children. BMJ. 371:m4238, 2020 11 18. | |
| 34. | Hayashi T, Kitamura K, Hashimoto S, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute otitis media in children-2018 update. Auris, Nasus, Larynx. 47(4):493-526, 2020 Aug. | |
| 35. | Elibol E, Baran H. Evaluation of the relationship of chronic otitis media with the Korner's septum, auditory tube angle, and tubotympanic angle. Surg Radiol Anat. 43(7):1179-1186, 2021 Jul. | |
| 36. | Tatlipinar A, Tuncel A, Ogredik EA, Gokceer T, Uslu C. The role of computed tomography scanning in chronic otitis media. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 269(1):33-8, 2012 Jan. | |
| 37. | Zanoletti E, Cazzador D, Faccioli C, Sari M, Bovo R, Martini A. Intracranial venous sinus thrombosis as a complication of otitis media in children: Critical review of diagnosis and management. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology. 79(12):2398-403, 2015 Dec. | |
| 38. | Saat R, Mahmood G, Laulajainen-Hongisto A, et al. Comparison of MR imaging findings in paediatric and adult patients with acute mastoiditis and incidental intramastoid bright signal on T2-weighted images. Eur Radiol. 26(8):2632-9, 2016 Aug. | |
| 39. | Kucur C, Simsek E, Kuduban O, Celebi I, Gursel AO. The clinical value of temporal bone tomography in chronic otitis media. Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg. 23(1):21-5, 2013 Jan-Feb. | |
| 40. | Hiraumi H, Yamamoto A, Yamamoto N, Sakamoto T, Ito J. Detection of the petrosquamosal sinus in chronic otitis media using high-resolution CT. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 149(3):488-91, 2013 Sep. | |
| 41. | Karatag O, Guclu O, Kosar S, Derekoy FS. Tegmen height: preoperative value of CT on preventing dural complications in chronic otitis media surgery. Clin Imaging. 38(3):246-8, 2014 May-Jun. | |
| 42. | Lee YF, Wei PY, Chu CH, Liao WH, Shiao AS, Wang MC. A Retrospective Study to Identify the Relationship Between the Dimension of Osseous External Auditory Canal and Chronic Otitis Media. Ear Nose Throat J. 99(8):532-536, 2020 Sep. | |
| 43. | Ng JH, Zhang EZ, Soon SR, et al. Pre-operative high resolution computed tomography scans for cholesteatoma: has anything changed?. American Journal of Otolaryngology. 35(4):508-13, 2014 Jul-Aug. | |
| 44. | Plodpai Y, Jongthitinon T, Atchariyasathian V, Pitathawatchai P, Hirunpat S, Kirtsreesakul V. Middle ear status in cholesteatoma: Associations among preoperative computed tomography scans, audiological assessments, and intraoperative endoscopic findings. Am J Otolaryngol. 43(1):103198, 2022 Jan-Feb. | |
| 45. | Stasolla A, Magliulo G, Cortese A, Roncacci A, Marini M. Preoperative imaging assessment of chronic otitis media: what does the otologist need to know?. [Review]. Radiol Med (Torino). 116(1):114-24, 2011 Feb. | |
| 46. | Kusak A, Rosiak O, Durko M, Grzelak P, Pietruszewska W. Diagnostic imaging in chronic otitis media: does CT and MRI fusion aid therapeutic decision making? - a pilot study. Otolaryngol Pol. 73(1):1-5, 2018 Oct 01. | |
| 47. | Russo C, Di Lullo AM, Cantone E, et al. Combining Thin-Section Coronal and Axial Diffusion Weighted Imaging: Good Practice in Middle Ear Cholesteatoma Neuroimaging. Front Neurol 2021;12:606692. | |
| 48. | Wiesmueller M, Wuest W, May MS, et al. Comparison of Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging and Single-Shot TSE DWI for Cholesteatoma Diagnostics. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 42(7):1305-1312, 2021 07. | |
| 49. | Baba A, Kurihara S, Fukuda T, et al. Non-echoplanar diffusion weighed imaging and T1-weighted imaging for cholesteatoma mastoid extension. Auris, Nasus, Larynx. 48(5):846-851, 2021 Oct. | |
| 50. | Barath K, Huber AM, Stampfli P, Varga Z, Kollias S. Neuroradiology of cholesteatomas. [Review]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 32(2):221-9, 2011 Feb. | |
| 51. | National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education; Committee on National Statistics; Committee on Measuring Sex, Gender Identity, and Sexual Orientation. Measuring Sex, Gender Identity, and Sexual Orientation. In: Becker T, Chin M, Bates N, eds. Measuring Sex, Gender Identity, and Sexual Orientation. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US) Copyright 2022 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.; 2022. | |
| 52. | American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Radiation Dose Assessment Introduction. Available at: https://edge.sitecorecloud.io/americancoldf5f-acrorgf92a-productioncb02-3650/media/ACR/Files/Clinical/Appropriateness-Criteria/ACR-Appropriateness-Criteria-Radiation-Dose-Assessment-Introduction.pdf. |
The ACR Committee on Appropriateness Criteria and its expert panels have developed criteria for determining appropriate imaging examinations for diagnosis and treatment of specified medical condition(s). These criteria are intended to guide radiologists, radiation oncologists and referring physicians in making decisions regarding radiologic imaging and treatment. Generally, the complexity and severity of a patient’s clinical condition should dictate the selection of appropriate imaging procedures or treatments. Only those examinations generally used for evaluation of the patient’s condition are ranked. Other imaging studies necessary to evaluate other co-existent diseases or other medical consequences of this condition are not considered in this document. The availability of equipment or personnel may influence the selection of appropriate imaging procedures or treatments. Imaging techniques classified as investigational by the FDA have not been considered in developing these criteria; however, study of new equipment and applications should be encouraged. The ultimate decision regarding the appropriateness of any specific radiologic examination or treatment must be made by the referring physician and radiologist in light of all the circumstances presented in an individual examination.