Variant 1: Child. 24 months of age or younger. Concern for physical abuse based on clinical presentation or history. Neurological, skeletal, or visceral injuries not clinically apparent. Initial imaging.
Variant 2: Child. Greater than 24 months of age. Concern for physical abuse based on clinical presentation or history. Neurological, skeletal, or visceral injuries not clinically apparent. Initial imaging.
Variant 3: Child. 24 months of age or younger. One or more physical examinations or clinical findings suspicious for CNS injury due to physical abuse: neurologic signs , symptoms, or other injuries (scalp bruises, hematoma, or skin injury to the head, neck, or spine). Initial imaging.
Variant 4: Child. Greater than 24 months of age of age. One or more physical examinations or clinical findings suspicious for CNS injury due to physical abuse: neurologic signs or symptoms or other injuries (scalp bruises, hematoma, or skin injury to the head, neck, or spine). Initial imaging.
Variant 5: Child. 24 months of age or younger. One or more physical examinations or clinical findings suspicious for visceral injury due to physical abuse: abdominal pain or other injuries (bruising, hematoma, or skin injury to the chest wall or trunk). Initial imaging.
Variant 6: Child. Greater than 24 months of age. One or more physical examinations or clinical findings suspicious for visceral injury due to physical abuse: abdominal pain or other injuries (bruising, hematoma, or skin injury to the chest wall or trunk). Initial imaging.
Variant 7: Child. 24 months of age or younger. Suspected physical abuse. Negative initial skeletal survey and CT head. Follow-up imaging within 10 to 14 days.
Variant 8: Child. 24 months of age or younger. Asymptomatic, who shares a home with a child with suspected or known physical abuse. Initial imaging.
Appendix Key

A more complete discussion of the items presented below can be found by accessing the supporting documents at the designated hyperlinks.

Appropriateness Category:The panel’s recommendation for a procedure based on the assessment of the risks and benefits of performing the procedure for the specified clinical scenario.

SOE: Strength of Evidence. The assessment of the amount and quality of evidence found in the peer reviewed medical literature for an appropriateness recommendation.

  • References: The citation number and PMID for the reference(s) associated with the recommendation.
  • Study Quality: The assessment of the quality of an individual reference based on the number of study quality elements described in the reference.

RRL: Relative Radiation Level. A population based assessment of the amount of radiation a typical patient may be exposed to during the specified procedure.

Rating: The final rating (1-9 scale) for the procedure as determined by the panel during rating rounds.

Median: The median rating (1-9 scale) for the procedure as determined by the panel during rating rounds.

Final tabulations: A histogram showing the number of panel members who rated the procedure as noted in the column heading (ie, 1, 2, 3, etc.).

Additional supporting documents about the AC methodology and processes can be found at www.acr.org/ac.