Variant 1: Suspected acute pyelonephritis. First-time presentation. Uncomplicated patient (eg, no history of pyelonephritis, diabetes, immune compromise, history of stones or renal obstruction, prior renal surgery, advanced age, vesicoureteral reflux, lack of response to therapy, or pregnancy). Initial imaging.
Variant 2: Suspected acute pyelonephritis. Complicated patient (eg, recurrent pyelonephritis, diabetes, immune compromise, advanced age, vesicoureteral reflux, or lack of response to initial therapy). Initial imaging.
Variant 3: Suspected acute pyelonephritis. History of renal stones or renal obstruction. Initial imaging.
Variant 4: Suspected acute pyelonephritis. Pregnant female with no other complications (eg, no history of diabetes, immune compromise, history of stones or renal obstruction, prior renal surgery, vesicoureteral reflux, or lack of response to therapy). Initial imaging.
Variant 5: Suspected acute pyelonephritis. History of pelvic renal transplant with native kidneys in situ and no other complications (eg, no history of pyelonephritis, diabetes, history of stones or renal obstruction, prior renal surgery, advanced age, vesicoureteral reflux, lack of response to therapy, or pregnancy). Initial imaging.
Appendix Key

A more complete discussion of the items presented below can be found by accessing the supporting documents at the designated hyperlinks.

Appropriateness Category:The panel’s recommendation for a procedure based on the assessment of the risks and benefits of performing the procedure for the specified clinical scenario.

SOE: Strength of Evidence. The assessment of the amount and quality of evidence found in the peer reviewed medical literature for an appropriateness recommendation.

  • References: The citation number and PMID for the reference(s) associated with the recommendation.
  • Study Quality: The assessment of the quality of an individual reference based on the number of study quality elements described in the reference.

RRL: Relative Radiation Level. A population based assessment of the amount of radiation a typical patient may be exposed to during the specified procedure.

Rating: The final rating (1-9 scale) for the procedure as determined by the panel during rating rounds.

Median: The median rating (1-9 scale) for the procedure as determined by the panel during rating rounds.

Final tabulations: A histogram showing the number of panel members who rated the procedure as noted in the column heading (ie, 1, 2, 3, etc.).

Additional supporting documents about the AC methodology and processes can be found at www.acr.org/ac.