American College of Radiology
ACR Appropriateness Criteria®

Acute Trauma to the Foot

Variant 1: Adult or child >5 years old. Acute injury to the foot; positive Ottawa Rules, suspicious for fracture. First study.
Procedure Appropriateness Category SOE Adult RRL Peds RRL Rating Median Final Tabulations
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
X-ray foot Usually appropriate ☢ <0.1 mSv ☢ <0.03 mSv [ped] 9 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CT foot with IV contrast Usually not appropriate ☢ <0.1 mSv ☢☢ 0.03-0.3 mSv [ped] 1 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MRI foot without and with IV contrast Usually not appropriate O 0 mSv O 0 mSv [ped] 1 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CT foot without and with IV contrast Usually not appropriate ☢ <0.1 mSv ☢☢ 0.03-0.3 mSv [ped] 1 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CT foot without IV contrast Usually not appropriate ☢ <0.1 mSv ☢☢ 0.03-0.3 mSv [ped] 1 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MRI foot without IV contrast Usually not appropriate O 0 mSv O 0 mSv [ped] 1 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
US foot Usually not appropriate O 0 mSv O 0 mSv [ped] 1 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Variant 2: Adult or child >5 years old. Acute injury to the foot; does not meet the Ottawa Rules; no focal tenderness in the foot or palpable abnormality of the foot on physical examination; able to walk; neurologically intact (including no peripheral neuropathy). First study.
Procedure Appropriateness Category SOE Adult RRL Peds RRL Rating Median Final Tabulations
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
CT foot without and with IV contrast Usually not appropriate ☢ <0.1 mSv ☢☢ 0.03-0.3 mSv [ped] 1 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CT foot with IV contrast Usually not appropriate ☢ <0.1 mSv ☢☢ 0.03-0.3 mSv [ped] 1 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MRI foot without and with IV contrast Usually not appropriate O 0 mSv O 0 mSv [ped] 1 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
X-ray foot Usually not appropriate ☢ <0.1 mSv ☢ <0.03 mSv [ped] 1 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
US foot Usually not appropriate O 0 mSv O 0 mSv [ped] 1 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MRI foot without IV contrast Usually not appropriate O 0 mSv O 0 mSv [ped] 1 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CT foot without IV contrast Usually not appropriate ☢ <0.1 mSv ☢☢ 0.03-0.3 mSv [ped] 1 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Variant 3: Adult or child >5 years old. Acute injury to the foot; does not meet the Ottawa Rules; patient is not neurologically intact and/or has a peripheral neuropathy that involves the feet. First study.
Procedure Appropriateness Category SOE Adult RRL Peds RRL Rating Median Final Tabulations
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
X-ray foot Usually appropriate ☢ <0.1 mSv ☢ <0.03 mSv [ped] 9 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CT foot without and with IV contrast Usually not appropriate ☢ <0.1 mSv ☢☢ 0.03-0.3 mSv [ped] 1 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CT foot with IV contrast Usually not appropriate ☢ <0.1 mSv ☢☢ 0.03-0.3 mSv [ped] 1 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MRI foot without and with IV contrast Usually not appropriate O 0 mSv O 0 mSv [ped] 1 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
US foot Usually not appropriate O 0 mSv O 0 mSv [ped] 1 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MRI foot without IV contrast Usually not appropriate O 0 mSv O 0 mSv [ped] 1 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CT foot without IV contrast Usually not appropriate ☢ <0.1 mSv ☢☢ 0.03-0.3 mSv [ped] 1 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Variant 4: Adult or child >5 years old. Acute injury to the foot; does not meet the Ottawa Rules; patient has polytrauma. First study.
Procedure Appropriateness Category SOE Adult RRL Peds RRL Rating Median Final Tabulations
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
X-ray foot Usually appropriate ☢ <0.1 mSv ☢ <0.03 mSv [ped] 9 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CT foot without and with IV contrast Usually not appropriate ☢ <0.1 mSv ☢☢ 0.03-0.3 mSv [ped] 1 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CT foot with IV contrast Usually not appropriate ☢ <0.1 mSv ☢☢ 0.03-0.3 mSv [ped] 1 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
US foot Usually not appropriate O 0 mSv O 0 mSv [ped] 1 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MRI foot without IV contrast Usually not appropriate O 0 mSv O 0 mSv [ped] 1 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CT foot without IV contrast Usually not appropriate ☢ <0.1 mSv ☢☢ 0.03-0.3 mSv [ped] 1 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MRI foot without and with IV contrast Usually not appropriate O 0 mSv O 0 mSv [ped] 1 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Variant 5: Adult or child >5 years old. Acute injury to the foot; does not meet the Ottawa Rules; physical examination is concerning for a Lisfranc injury. First study.
Procedure Appropriateness Category SOE Adult RRL Peds RRL Rating Median Final Tabulations
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
X-ray foot Usually appropriate ☢ <0.1 mSv ☢ <0.03 mSv [ped] 9 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
X-ray foot with weight bearing Usually appropriate ☢ <0.1 mSv ☢ <0.03 mSv [ped] 7 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CT foot with IV contrast Usually not appropriate ☢ <0.1 mSv ☢☢ 0.03-0.3 mSv [ped] 1 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CT foot without and with IV contrast Usually not appropriate ☢ <0.1 mSv ☢☢ 0.03-0.3 mSv [ped] 1 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MRI foot without and with IV contrast Usually not appropriate O 0 mSv O 0 mSv [ped] 1 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
US foot Usually not appropriate O 0 mSv O 0 mSv [ped] 1 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MRI foot without IV contrast Usually not appropriate O 0 mSv O 0 mSv [ped] 1 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CT foot without IV contrast Usually not appropriate ☢ <0.1 mSv ☢☢ 0.03-0.3 mSv [ped] 1 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Variant 6: Adult or child >5 years old. Acute injury to the foot; physical examination is concerning for a Lisfranc injury. Radiographs are normal and patient is not able to tolerate a weight-bearing radiographic view. Next imaging study.
Procedure Appropriateness Category SOE Adult RRL Peds RRL Rating Median Final Tabulations
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
MRI foot without IV contrast Usually appropriate O 0 mSv O 0 mSv [ped] 9 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CT foot without IV contrast Usually appropriate ☢ <0.1 mSv ☢☢ 0.03-0.3 mSv [ped] 9 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CT foot with IV contrast Usually not appropriate ☢ <0.1 mSv ☢☢ 0.03-0.3 mSv [ped] 1 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MRI foot without and with IV contrast Usually not appropriate O 0 mSv O 0 mSv [ped] 1 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CT foot without and with IV contrast Usually not appropriate ☢ <0.1 mSv ☢☢ 0.03-0.3 mSv [ped] 1 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
US foot Usually not appropriate O 0 mSv O 0 mSv [ped] 1 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Variant 7: Adult or child >5 years old. Acute injury to the foot; physical examination is concerning for an acute tendinous rupture or dislocation in the foot; radiographs are negative. Next imaging study.
Procedure Appropriateness Category SOE Adult RRL Peds RRL Rating Median Final Tabulations
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
MRI foot without IV contrast Usually appropriate O 0 mSv O 0 mSv [ped] 9 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
US foot May be appropriate O 0 mSv O 0 mSv [ped] 5 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CT foot without IV contrast May be appropriate ☢ <0.1 mSv ☢☢ 0.03-0.3 mSv [ped] 5 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CT foot with IV contrast Usually not appropriate ☢ <0.1 mSv ☢☢ 0.03-0.3 mSv [ped] 1 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MRI foot without and with IV contrast Usually not appropriate O 0 mSv O 0 mSv [ped] 1 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CT foot without and with IV contrast Usually not appropriate ☢ <0.1 mSv ☢☢ 0.03-0.3 mSv [ped] 1 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Variant 8: Adult or child >5 years old. Metatarsal-phalangeal joint injury. Suspect plantar plate injury. First study.
Procedure Appropriateness Category SOE Adult RRL Peds RRL Rating Median Final Tabulations
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
X-ray foot Usually appropriate ☢ <0.1 mSv ☢ <0.03 mSv [ped] 9 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
X-ray foot forced dorsiflexion lateral May be appropriate ☢ <0.1 mSv ☢ <0.03 mSv [ped] 5 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Fluoroscopy foot May be appropriate ☢ <0.1 mSv ☢ <0.03 mSv [ped] 5 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MRI foot without IV contrast May be appropriate O 0 mSv O 0 mSv [ped] 5 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CT foot with IV contrast Usually not appropriate ☢ <0.1 mSv ☢☢ 0.03-0.3 mSv [ped] 1 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MRI foot without and with IV contrast Usually not appropriate O 0 mSv O 0 mSv [ped] 1 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CT foot without and with IV contrast Usually not appropriate ☢ <0.1 mSv ☢☢ 0.03-0.3 mSv [ped] 1 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
US foot Usually not appropriate O 0 mSv O 0 mSv [ped] 1 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CT foot without IV contrast Usually not appropriate ☢ <0.1 mSv ☢☢ 0.03-0.3 mSv [ped] 1 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Variant 9: Adult or child >5 years old. Acute injury to the foot; physical examination is concerning for penetrating trauma with a foreign body in the soft tissues. First study.
Procedure Appropriateness Category SOE Adult RRL Peds RRL Rating Median Final Tabulations
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
X-ray foot Usually appropriate ☢ <0.1 mSv ☢ <0.03 mSv [ped] 9 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
US foot Usually appropriate O 0 mSv O 0 mSv [ped] 7 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MRI foot without and with IV contrast Usually not appropriate O 0 mSv O 0 mSv [ped] 1 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CT foot with IV contrast Usually not appropriate ☢ <0.1 mSv ☢☢ 0.03-0.3 mSv [ped] 1 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CT foot without and with IV contrast Usually not appropriate ☢ <0.1 mSv ☢☢ 0.03-0.3 mSv [ped] 1 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MRI foot without IV contrast Usually not appropriate O 0 mSv O 0 mSv [ped] 1 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CT foot without IV contrast Usually not appropriate ☢ <0.1 mSv ☢☢ 0.03-0.3 mSv [ped] 1 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Variant 10: Adult or child >5 years old. Acute injury to the foot; physical examination is concerning for penetrating trauma with a foreign body in the soft tissues. Radiographs of the foot are negative. Next best study.
Procedure Appropriateness Category SOE Adult RRL Peds RRL Rating Median Final Tabulations
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
US foot Usually appropriate O 0 mSv O 0 mSv [ped] 9 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MRI foot without IV contrast May be appropriate O 0 mSv O 0 mSv [ped] 5 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CT foot without IV contrast May be appropriate ☢ <0.1 mSv ☢☢ 0.03-0.3 mSv [ped] 5 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MRI foot without and with IV contrast Usually not appropriate O 0 mSv O 0 mSv [ped] 1 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CT foot with IV contrast Usually not appropriate ☢ <0.1 mSv ☢☢ 0.03-0.3 mSv [ped] 1 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CT foot without and with IV contrast Usually not appropriate ☢ <0.1 mSv ☢☢ 0.03-0.3 mSv [ped] 1 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Please refer to the supporting documentation for a more complete discussion of the concepts and their definitions below.
Final Tabulations:
A histogram of the number of panel members who rated the recommendation as noted in the column heading (ie, 1, 2, 3, …etc.)
Disagree:
The variation of the individual ratings from the median rating indicates panel disagreement on the final recommendation.
References:
Lists the references associated with the recommendation
SQ:
Study Quality (1, 2, 3, 4, Good M or Inadequate M) of the references listed.
RRL:
Information on the Relative Radiation Level (RRL) designations can be found here.