Variant 1: Known or suspected congenital heart disease in the adult.
|Procedure||Appropriateness Category||SOE||Adult RRL||Peds RRL||Rating||Median||Final Tabulations|
|US echocardiography transesophageal||Usually appropriate||O 0 mSv||O 0 mSv [ped]||7||n/a||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0|
|US echocardiography transthoracic resting||Usually appropriate||O 0 mSv||O 0 mSv [ped]||9||n/a||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0|
|Radiography chest||Usually appropriate||☢ <0.1 mSv||☢ <0.03 mSv [ped]||9||n/a||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0|
|MRA chest without and with IV contrast||Usually appropriate||O 0 mSv||O 0 mSv [ped]||7||n/a||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0|
|MRI heart function and morphology without and with IV contrast||Usually appropriate||O 0 mSv||O 0 mSv [ped]||9||n/a||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0|
|MRI heart function and morphology without IV contrast||Usually appropriate||O 0 mSv||O 0 mSv [ped]||8||n/a||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0|
|CTA coronary arteries with IV contrast||Usually appropriate||☢☢☢ 1-10 mSv||7||n/a||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0|
|CT heart function and morphology with IV contrast||Usually appropriate||☢☢☢☢ 10-30 mSv||7||n/a||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0|
|Arteriography coronary with ventriculography||May be appropriate||☢☢☢ 1-10 mSv||6||n/a||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0|
|MRA chest without IV contrast||May be appropriate||O 0 mSv||O 0 mSv [ped]||6||n/a||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0|
|CTA chest with IV contrast||May be appropriate||☢☢☢ 1-10 mSv||☢☢☢☢ 3-10 mSv [ped]||6||n/a||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0|
|Nuclear medicine ventriculography||May be appropriate||☢☢☢ 1-10 mSv||4||n/a||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0||0|
A more complete discussion of the items presented below can be found by accessing the supporting documents at the designated hyperlinks.
Appropriateness Category:The panel’s recommendation for a procedure based on the assessment of the risks and benefits of performing the procedure for the specified clinical scenario.
SOE: Strength of Evidence. The assessment of the amount and quality of evidence found in the peer reviewed medical literature for an appropriateness recommendation.
- References: The citation number and PMID for the reference(s) associated with the recommendation.
- Study Quality: The assessment of the quality of an individual reference based on the number of study quality elements described in the reference.
RRL: Relative Radiation Level. A population based assessment of the amount of radiation a typical patient may be exposed to during the specified procedure.
Rating: The final rating (1-9 scale) for the procedure as determined by the panel during rating rounds.
Median: The median rating (1-9 scale) for the procedure as determined by the panel during rating rounds.
Final tabulations: A histogram showing the number of panel members who rated the procedure as noted in the column heading (ie, 1, 2, 3, etc.).
Additional supporting documents about the AC methodology and processes can be found at www.acr.org/ac.