Variant 1: Age greater than or equal to 16 years and less than 65 years. Suspected acute blunt cervical spine trauma; imaging not indicated by NEXUS or CCR clinical criteria. Patient meets low-risk criteria. Initial imaging.
Variant 2: Age greater than or equal to 16 years. Suspected acute cervical spine blunt trauma. Imaging indicated by NEXUS or CCR clinical criteria. Initial imaging.
Variant 3: Age greater than or equal to 16 years. Suspected acute cervical spine blunt trauma. Confirmed or suspected cervical spinal cord or nerve root injury, with or without traumatic injury identified on cervical CT. Next imaging study.
Variant 4: Age greater than or equal to 16 years. Acute cervical spine injury detected on radiographs. Treatment planning for mechanically unstable spine.
Variant 5: Age greater than or equal to 16 years. Suspected acute cervical spine blunt trauma. Clinical or imaging findings suggest arterial injury with or without positive cervical spine CT. Next imaging study.
Variant 6: Age greater than or equal to 16 years. Suspected acute cervical spine blunt trauma. Obtunded patient with no traumatic injury identified on cervical spine CT. Next imaging study after CT cervical spine without IV contrast.
Variant 7: Age greater than or equal to 16 years. Suspected acute cervical spine blunt trauma. Clinical or imaging findings suggest ligamentous injury. Next imaging study after CT cervical spine without IV contrast.
Variant 8: Age greater than or equal to 16 years. Suspected acute cervical spine blunt trauma. Follow-up imaging on patient with no unstable injury demonstrated initially, but kept in collar for neck pain. No new neurologic symptoms. Includes whiplash associated disorders.
Variant 9: Age greater than or equal to 16 years. Blunt trauma meeting criteria for thoracic and lumbar imaging. Initial imaging.
Variant 10: Age greater than or equal to 16 years. Acute thoracic or lumbar spine injury detected on radiographs or noncontrast CT. Neurologic abnormalities. Next imaging study.
Appendix Key

A more complete discussion of the items presented below can be found by accessing the supporting documents at the designated hyperlinks.

Appropriateness Category:The panel’s recommendation for a procedure based on the assessment of the risks and benefits of performing the procedure for the specified clinical scenario.

SOE: Strength of Evidence. The assessment of the amount and quality of evidence found in the peer reviewed medical literature for an appropriateness recommendation.

  • References: The citation number and PMID for the reference(s) associated with the recommendation.
  • Study Quality: The assessment of the quality of an individual reference based on the number of study quality elements described in the reference.

RRL: Relative Radiation Level. A population based assessment of the amount of radiation a typical patient may be exposed to during the specified procedure.

Rating: The final rating (1-9 scale) for the procedure as determined by the panel during rating rounds.

Median: The median rating (1-9 scale) for the procedure as determined by the panel during rating rounds.

Final tabulations: A histogram showing the number of panel members who rated the procedure as noted in the column heading (ie, 1, 2, 3, etc.).

Additional supporting documents about the AC methodology and processes can be found at www.acr.org/ac.