| 1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin 2021;71:7-33. |
Review/Other-Dx |
N/A |
Each year, the American Cancer Society estimates the numbers of new cancer cases and deaths in the United States and compiles the most recent data on population-based cancer occurrence. Incidence data (through 2017) were collected by the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program; the National Program of Cancer Registries; and the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries. Mortality data (through 2018) were collected by the National Center for Health Statistics. In 2021, 1,898,160 new cancer cases and 608,570 cancer deaths are projected to occur in the United States. After increasing for most of the 20th century, the cancer death rate has fallen continuously from its peak in 1991 through 2018, for a total decline of 31%, because of reductions in smoking and improvements in early detection and treatment. This translates to 3.2 million fewer cancer deaths than would have occurred if peak rates had persisted. Long-term declines in mortality for the 4 leading cancers have halted for prostate cancer and slowed for breast and colorectal cancers, but accelerated for lung cancer, which accounted for almost one-half of the total mortality decline from 2014 to 2018. The pace of the annual decline in lung cancer mortality doubled from 3.1% during 2009 through 2013 to 5.5% during 2014 through 2018 in men, from 1.8% to 4.4% in women, and from 2.4% to 5% overall. This trend coincides with steady declines in incidence (2.2%-2.3%) but rapid gains in survival specifically for nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). For example, NSCLC 2-year relative survival increased from 34% for persons diagnosed during 2009 through 2010 to 42% during 2015 through 2016, including absolute increases of 5% to 6% for every stage of diagnosis; survival for small cell lung cancer remained at 14% to 15%. Improved treatment accelerated progress against lung cancer and drove a record drop in overall cancer mortality, despite slowing momentum for other common cancers. |
No results stated in abstract. |
4 |
| 2. Betancourt Cuellar SL, Palacio DP, Benveniste MF, Carter BW, Hofstetter WL, Marom EM. Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Esophageal Carcinoma: Applications and Limitations. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 38(6):571-583, 2017 Dec. |
Review/Other-Dx |
NA |
To discuss the applications and limitations Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Esophageal. |
No results stated in the abstract. |
4 |
| 3. Rice TW, Patil DT, Blackstone EH. 8th edition AJCC/UICC staging of cancers of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction: application to clinical practice. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2017;6:119-30. |
Review/Other-Dx |
N/A |
To present separate classifications for clinical (cTNM), pathologic (pTNM), and postneoadjuvant (ypTNM) stage groups. |
No results stated in the abstract. |
4 |
| 4. Picus D, Balfe DM, Koehler RE, Roper CL, Owen JW. Computed tomography in the staging of esophageal carcinoma. Radiology 1983;146:433-8. |
Observational-Dx |
52 patients |
To discuss the computed tomography in the staging of esophageal carcinoma. |
No results stated in the abstract. |
2 |
| 5. Takashima S, Takeuchi N, Shiozaki H, et al. Carcinoma of the esophagus: CT vs MR imaging in determining resectability. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991;156:297-302. |
Observational-Dx |
35 patients |
To determine the resectability of primary tumors in patients who had performed MR imaging and CT. |
No results were stated in the abstract. |
2 |
| 6. Puli SR, Reddy JB, Bechtold ML, Antillon D, Ibdah JA, Antillon MR. Staging accuracy of esophageal cancer by endoscopic ultrasound: a meta-analysis and systematic review. World J Gastroenterol 2008;14:1479-90. |
Meta-analysis |
49 studies |
To evaluate the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in the staging of esophageal cancer. |
Forty-nine studies (n = 2558) which met the inclusion criteria were included in this analysis. Pooled sensitivity and specificity of EUS to diagnose T1 was 81.6% (95% CI: 77.8-84.9) and 99.4% (95% CI: 99.0-99.7), respectively. To diagnose T4, EUS had a pooled sensitivity of 92.4% (95% CI: 89.2-95.0) and specificity of 97.4% (95% CI: 96.6-98.0). With Fine Needle Aspiration (FNA), sensitivity of EUS to diagnose N stage improved from 84.7% (95% CI: 82.9-86.4) to 96.7% (95% CI: 92.4-98.9). The P value for the c2 test of heterogeneity for all pooled estimates was > 0.10. |
Good |
| 7. Choi J, Kim SG, Kim JS, Jung HC, Song IS. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), positron emission tomography (PET), and computed tomography (CT) in the preoperative locoregional staging of resectable esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc. 24(6):1380-6, 2010 Jun. |
Observational-Dx |
109 patients |
To compare the diagnostic performance of EUS, positron emission tomography (PET), and computed tomography (CT) in the locoregional staging of resectable esophageal cancer. |
The overall accuracy of EUS for T staging was 72%, and it was the only method for delineating the layers of the esophageal wall. The sensitivities for N staging were 42% for EUS, 49% for PET, and 35% for CT, and their specificities were, respectively, 91, 87, and 93%. The accuracy for N staging was 66% for EUS, 68% for PET, and 63% for CT, and it did not differ significantly across the three tests. |
2 |
| 8. Foley KG, Christian A, Fielding P, Lewis WG, Roberts SA. Accuracy of contemporary oesophageal cancer lymph node staging with radiological-pathological correlation. Clin Radiol. 72(8):693.e1-693.e7, 2017 Aug. |
Observational-Dx |
112 patients |
To evaluate the accuracy of contemporary N-staging and provide radiological-pathological correlation in patients with lymph node metastases (LNMs) that were radiologically staged N0. |
Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of N0 versus N+ disease with CECT, EUS, and PET/CT was 54.5%, 39.7% and 77.3%, 55.4%, 42.6% and 75%, and 57.1% 35.3%, and 90.9%, respectively. All techniques were more likely to under-stage nodal disease; CECT (X2 32.890, df=1, p<0.001), EUS (X2 28.471, df=1, p<0.001), and PET/CT (X2 50.790, df=1, p<0.001). PET/CT was more likely to under-stage nodal disease than EUS (p=0.031). Median LNM size was 3 mm, with 41 (82%) of LNMs measuring <6 mm and 22 (44%) classified as micro-metastases (=2 mm). |
2 |
| 9. Kajiyama Y, Iwanuma Y, Tomita N, et al. Size analysis of lymph node metastasis in esophageal cancer: diameter distribution and assessment of accuracy of preoperative diagnosis. Esophagus 2006;3:189-95. |
Review/Other-Tx |
N/A |
To discuss the analysis of lymph node metastasis in esophageal cancer |
No results stated in the abstract. |
4 |
| 10. Bunting D, Bracey T, Fox B, Berrisford R, Wheatley T, Sanders G. Loco-regional staging accuracy in oesophageal cancer-How good are we in the modern era?. Eur J Radiol. 97:71-75, 2017 Dec. |
Observational-Dx |
133 patients |
To investigate the staging accuracy in relation to CT, EUS, PET-CT and final pre-operative stage. It specifically addresses the accuracy of staging with respect to the threshold for administering neoadjuvant therapies. |
T stage accuracies were 72.6%, 76.7% and 79.3% for CT, EUS and final pre-operative stage respectively. N stage accuracies were 75.6%, 77.2%, 74.5% and 78.6% for CT, EUS, PET-CT and final pre-operative stage respectively. Staging accuracy with respect to threshold for neoadjuvant treatment showed 62.0% early tumours were correctly staged and 80.5% advanced tumours were correctly staged. Whether or not patients underwent EUS did not affect the staging accuracy with respect to neoadjuvant treatment threshold. |
2 |
| 11. Heeren PA, Jager PL, Bongaerts F, van Dullemen H, Sluiter W, Plukker JT. Detection of distant metastases in esophageal cancer with (18)F-FDG PET. J Nucl Med 2004;45:980-7. |
Observational-Dx |
74 patients |
To investigate whether the addition of PET with (18)F-FDG is a valuable gain in the initial staging. |
PET identified 70 primary tumors (sensitivity, 95%). Sensitivity to identify locoregional metastases was highest for EUS (69%) but was not different for CT and PET (44% and 55%, respectively). PET was able to identify distant nodal disease in 71% (17/24 patients) compared with 29% (7/24 patients) after combined CT/EUS alone (P = 0.021). Sensitivity to detect distant nodal and systemic (M1) disease increased with PET (78% vs. 37%; P = 0.012). PET upstaged 15 patients (15/74; 20%) correctly as M1 disease, missed by CT/EUS, and correctly downstaged 4 patients (5%) from M1 to M0 disease. However, false upstaging and downstaging was encountered in 5 (7%) and 3 (4%) patients, respectively. |
2 |
| 12. Hocazade C, Ozdemir N, Yazici O, et al. Concordance of positron emission tomography and computed tomography in patients with locally advanced gastric and esophageal cancer. Annals of Nuclear Medicine. 29(7):621-6, 2015 Aug. |
Observational-Dx |
91 patients |
To evaluate the contribution of PET-CT scans compared to conventional imaging studies on the change of treatment plan in patients with locally advanced esophagogastric cancer from neoadjuvant to palliative setting |
Ninety-one patients were included in the study. Their median age was 57 (range 30-80) years and three-quarters of the patients were male. Most of the patients were evaluated by PET-CT due to suspicion of distant metastasis (83.5%). Primary sites of the tumors on PET-CT were: esophagus 38.5% and stomach 61.5%. Between CT and PET-CT tumor stage and pathological lymphadenopathy concordance rates were 75.8, and 69.2%, respectively. On PET-CT evaluation 47.3% of patients had distant metastasis. New metastases were detected in 34.1% of patients by PET-CT despite entering to scanning field of tomography. Following the PET-CT evaluation due to detected metastasis, 47.3% of patients' treatment plan was changed from neoadjuvant to palliative therapy. |
2 |
| 13. Walker AJ, Spier BJ, Perlman SB, et al. Integrated PET/CT fusion imaging and endoscopic ultrasound in the pre-operative staging and evaluation of esophageal cancer. Mol Imaging Biol. 13(1):166-71, 2011 Feb. |
Observational-Dx |
81 patients |
To evaluate the role of integrated PET/CT imaging and EUS in the staging of ECA. |
Eighty-one patients (65 male, 16 female) were identified with mean age of 63.5 years who underwent EUS and PET/CT to stage known ECA. PET/CT identified the primary tumor in 74/81 (91.4%) of cases, compared to 81/81 (100%) with EUS. Locoregional adenopathy was seen by PET/CT in 29/81 (35.8%) of cases, compared to 49/81 (60.5%) by EUS (p = 0.0001). PET/CT identified celiac axis adenopathy in 8/81 (9.9%) of cases, compared to 11/81 (13.6%) with EUS (p = 0.5050). PET/CT identified 17/81 (21.0%) of patients with distant metastases who subsequently did not undergo attempt at curative surgical resection. |
2 |
| 14. Hsu WH, Hsu PK, Wang SJ, et al. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography in predicting locoregional invasion in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg. 87(5):1564-8, 2009 May. |
Observational-Dx |
45 patients |
To clarify the role of positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma we investigated its value in predicting locoregional invasion. |
The mean maximal standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) was 5.09 +/- 4.00 in T1, 14.17 +/- 2.46 in T2, 13.32 +/- 3.96 in T3, and 10.37 +/- 1.94 in T4 primary tumor. The SUV(max) was significantly lower in stage T1 tumors than in stage T2 and T3 tumors. For regional nodal involvement, PET/CT findings significantly correlated with pathology results. However, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of PET/CT were only 57.1%, 83.3%, and 71.1%, respectively, and even lower for detecting nonregional lymph node metastasis. When stratified by the modified staging system, the mean SUV(max) was 0.64 +/- 1.60 in N0, 1.43 +/- 2.08 in N1, and 4.67 +/- 4.32 in N2 regional lymph node metastases, and was significantly higher in patients with N2 metastasis than in patients with N0 and N1 metastases. |
2 |
| 15. van Westreenen HL, Westerterp M, Bossuyt PM, et al. Systematic review of the staging performance of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in esophageal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:3805-12. |
Meta-analysis |
12 studies |
To systematically review the literature regarding the diagnostic performance of FDG-PET in preoperative staging of patients with esophageal cancer, and to calculate summary estimates of its sensitivity and specificity. |
Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria. The studies had several design deficiencies. Pooled sensitivity and specificity for the detection of locoregional metastases were 0.51 (95% CI, 0.34 to 0.69) and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.76 to 0.91), respectively. For distant metastases, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.67 (95% CI, 0.58 to 0.76) and 0.97 (95% CI, 0.90 to 1.0), respectively. |
Inadequate |
| 16. Vyas S, Markar SR, Iordanidou L, et al. The role of integrated F-18-FDG-PET scanning in the detection of M1 disease in oesophageal adenocarcinoma and impact on clinical management. J Gastrointest Surg. 15(12):2127-35, 2011 Dec. |
Observational-Dx |
104 patients |
To evaluate the efficacy of F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) scanning in the staging of oesophageal adenocarcinoma. |
Nineteen patients (18.26%) were found to have non-loco-regional FDG uptake. Of the patients, 3.84% were found to have M1 disease and 7.69% were found to have a second primary tumour. The sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET scanning to detect metastatic disease in our series was 57.14% and 84.53%, respectively. The overall diagnostic accuracy was 82.69%. |
2 |
| 17. You JJ, Wong RK, Darling G, Gulenchyn K, Urbain JL, Evans WK. Clinical utility of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the staging of patients with potentially resectable esophageal cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 8(12):1563-9, 2013 Dec. |
Observational-Dx |
491 patients |
To compare the stage of disease based on PET/CT with the stage based on conventional staging performed before PET/CT (American Joint Committee on Cancer, 6th edition). |
Four hundred ninety-one patients who received a PET/CT scan for staging of potentially resectable esophageal cancer were included in the study cohort. PET/CT led to clinically important changes in stage for a total of 188 patients (24.0%): 107 patients (21.8%) were upstaged and 11 patients (2.2%) were downstaged. Results of PET/CT were associated with differences in actual management. At the 6-month follow-up, use of surgery was greater in patients with M0 disease (54.4%) compared with those with M1a (25.0%; p < 0.001) or M1b (7.3%; p < 0.001) disease based on PET/CT. The overall cohort had a median survival of 603 days, and higher stage of disease on PET/CT (i.e., M stage) was associated with shorter survival (p < 0.001). |
2 |
| 18. Williams RN, Ubhi SS, Sutton CD, Thomas AL, Entwisle JJ, Bowrey DJ. The early use of PET-CT alters the management of patients with esophageal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 13(5):868-73, 2009 May. |
Observational-Dx |
38 patients |
To determine the frequency with which PET-CT influenced decision making in the management of patients with carcinoma of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction. |
PET-CT changed the staging for ten patients (26%). This translated into a change in management decision for seven patients (18%). The concordance between individual management plans and treatment intent was 79% for CT (150 of 190 decisions) and it was 92% for PET-CT (175 of 190 decisions). Full concordance between multidisciplinary team members was 66% with CT staging and 74% with the addition of PET-CT. |
2 |
| 19. Lee G, I H, Kim SJ, et al. Clinical implication of PET/MR imaging in preoperative esophageal cancer staging: comparison with PET/CT, endoscopic ultrasonography, and CT. J Nucl Med. 55(8):1242-7, 2014 Aug. |
Observational-Dx |
19 patients |
To compare the diagnostic efficacies of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), CT, PET/MR imaging, and PET/CT for the preoperative local and regional staging of esophageal cancer, with postoperative pathologic stage used as the reference standard. |
Primary tumors were correctly staged in 13 (86.7%), 10 (66.7%), and 5 (33.3%) patients at EUS, PET/MR imaging, and CT, respectively (P value ranging from 0.021 to 0.375). The accuracy of determining T1 lesions was 86.7%, 80.0%, and 46.7% for EUS, PET/MR imaging, and CT, respectively. For distinguishing T3 lesions, the accuracy was 93.3% for EUS and 86.7% for both PET/MR imaging and CT. For lymph node staging, the accuracy was 83.3%, 75.0%, 66.7%, and 50.0% for PET/MR imaging, EUS, PET/CT, and CT, respectively. In addition, area-under-the-curve values were 0.800, 0.700, 0.629, and 0.543 for PET/MR imaging, EUS, PET/CT, and CT, respectively. |
2 |
| 20. Giganti F, Ambrosi A, Petrone MC, et al. Prospective comparison of MR with diffusion-weighted imaging, endoscopic ultrasound, MDCT and positron emission tomography-CT in the pre-operative staging of oesophageal cancer: results from a pilot study. Br J Radiol. 89(1068):20160087, 2016 Dec. |
Observational-Dx |
18 patients |
To compare the diagnostic performance of MR and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), multidetector CT, endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and 18F-FDG (fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose) positron emission tomography CT (PET-CT) in the pre-operative locoregional staging of oesophageal cancer. |
For T staging, EUS showed the best sensitivity (100%), whereas MR showed the highest specificity (92%) and accuracy (83%). For N staging, MR and EUS showed the highest sensitivity (100%), but none of the techniques showed adequate results for specificity. Overall, MR showed the highest accuracy (66%) for N stage, although this was not significantly different to the other modalities. The apparent diffusion coefficient was different between surgery-only and chemo-/radiotherapy groups (1.90 vs 1.30 × 10-3 mm2 s-1, respectively; p = 0.005)-optimal cut off for local invasion: 1.33 × 10-3 mm2 s-1 (p = 0.05). Difference in standardized uptake value was also very close to conventional levels of statistical significance (8.81 vs 13.97 g cm-3, respectively; p = 0.05)-optimal cut off: 7.97 g cm-3 (p = 0.44). |
2 |
| 21. Qu J, Zhang H, Wang Z, et al. Comparison between free-breathing radial VIBE on 3-T MRI and endoscopic ultrasound for preoperative T staging of resectable oesophageal cancer, with histopathological correlation. Eur Radiol. 28(2):780-787, 2018 Feb. |
Observational-Dx |
43 patients |
To compare the T staging of resectable oesophageal cancer (OC) using radial VIBE (r-VIBE) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) with pathological confirmation of the T stage. |
EUS and pathological T staging showed agreement of 69.8% (30/43). Radial VIBE and pathological T staging agreement was 86.0% (37/43) and 90.7% (39/43) for readers 1 and 2, respectively. High accuracy for T1/T2 stage was obtained for both r-VIBE readers (90.5% and 100% for reader 1 and reader 2, respectively) and EUS reader (100%). For T3/T4, r-VIBE showed accuracy of 81.8% and 90.9% for reader 1 and reader 2, respectively, while for EUS, accuracy was only 68.2% compared with pathological T staging. |
2 |
| 22. Malik V, Harmon M, Johnston C, et al. Whole Body MRI in the Staging of Esophageal Cancer--A Prospective Comparison with Whole Body 18F-FDG PET-CT. Dig Surg. 32(5):397-408, 2015. |
Observational-Dx |
49 patients |
To emulate the anatomical (T1-weighed (T1W) and T2W imaging) and functional information (diffusion-weighted imaging) provided by PET-CT. |
PET-CT and WBMRI identified the primary tumor in 46/49 (94%) and 48/49 (98%) patients, respectively. Nodal analysis in patients undergoing surgery (n = 18) yielded sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy of 27, 100, 100, 47 and 56% for PET-CT, compared with 30, 100, 100, 53 and 61% for WBMRI. When nodal analysis included both surgical specimens and EUS criteria (n = 39), sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy were 46, 91, 93, 40 and 59% for PET-CT compared with 59, 92, 94, 50 and 67% for WBMRI. Both imaging modalities identified distant metastases in 2 patients. |
2 |
| 23. van Heijl M, Phoa SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, et al. Accuracy and reproducibility of 3D-CT measurements for early response assessment of chemoradiotherapy in patients with oesophageal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 37(12):1064-71, 2011 Dec. |
Observational-Dx |
39 patients |
To determine whether 3D-CT volumetry is able to differentiate between responding and non-responding oesophageal tumours early in the course of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. |
CT response analysis was performed in 39 patients, of whom 26 patients were histopathological responders. Median tumour volume increased between baseline and after 14 days of chemoradiotherapy in histopathological responders as well as in non-responders, though changes were not statistically significant. The area under the ROC curve was 0.71. |
2 |
| 24. Konieczny A, Meyer P, Schnider A, et al. Accuracy of multidetector-row CT for restaging after neoadjuvant treatment in patients with oesophageal cancer. Eur Radiol. 23(9):2492-502, 2013 Sep. |
Observational-Dx |
35 patients |
To assess the diagnostic accuracy of 64-multidetector CT (MDCT) for restaging of patients with oesophageal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant therapy. |
64-MDCT predicted T stage correctly in 34 % (12/35), overstaged in 49 % (17/35) and understaged in 17 % (6/35). Sensitivity/specificity values were as follows: T0, 20 %/92 %; T1-T2, 31 %/59 %; T3, 60 %/64 %; T4, 100 %/4 %. Negative predictive values for T3/T4 were 80 %/100 %. MDCT accurately predicted complete histopathological response in 20 % (accuracy 74 %) and overstaged in 80 %. Tumour regression grade was predicted correctly in only 8 % (2/25) and underestimated in 68 % (17/25). Accurate N stage was noted in 69 % (24/35). |
2 |
| 25. Westerterp M, van Westreenen HL, Reitsma JB, et al. Esophageal cancer: CT, endoscopic US, and FDG PET for assessment of response to neoadjuvant therapy--systematic review. Radiology 2005;236:841-51. |
Review/Other-Dx |
4 studies |
To compare diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography (CT), endoscopic ultrasonography (US), and fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) for assessment of response to neoadjuvant therapy in patients with esophageal cancer by using a systematic review of the literature. |
Four studies with CT, 13 with endoscopic US, and seven with FDG PET met inclusion criteria. Percentages of the maximum score in regard to methodological quality ranged from 15% to 100%. Summary ROC analysis could be performed for three studies with CT, four with endoscopic US, and four with FDG PET. The maximum joint values for sensitivity and specificity were 54% for CT, 86% for endoscopic US, and 85% for FDG PET. Accuracy of CT was significantly lower than that of FDG PET (P < .006) and of endoscopic US (P < .003). Accuracy of FDG PET and that of endoscopic US were similar (P = .839). In all patients, CT was always feasible, whereas endoscopic US was not feasible in 6% of the patients, and FDG PET was not feasible in less than 1%. |
4 |
| 26. Gabrielson S, Sanchez-Crespo A, Klevebro F, et al. 18F FDG-PET/CT evaluation of histological response after neoadjuvant treatment in patients with cancer of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction. Acta Radiol. 60(5):578-585, 2019 May. |
Experimental-Dx |
79 patients |
To evaluate changes in PET parameters in relation to the histological primary tumor response in the surgical specimen in patients randomized to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy. |
Seventy-nine patients were enrolled and 51 were available for analysis. A significant rate of SUR reduction was observed ( P = 0.02) in the primary tumor in histological responders compared to non-responders. Changes in SUR were significantly greater in responders following chemoradiotherapy ( P = 0.02), but not following chemotherapy alone ( P = 0.49). There was no statistically significant difference in SUR in patients with a complete histological response compared to those with a subtotal response. |
2 |
| 27. Beukinga RJ, Hulshoff JB, Mul VEM, et al. Prediction of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy with Baseline and Restaging 18F-FDG PET Imaging Biomarkers in Patients with Esophageal Cancer. Radiology. 287(3):983-992, 2018 Jun. |
Experimental-Dx |
73 patients |
To assess the value of baseline and restaging fluorine 18 (18F) fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) radiomics in predicting pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy (NCRT) in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer. |
No results stated in the abstract. |
2 |
| 28. Thurau K, Palmes D, Franzius C, et al. Impact of PET-CT on primary staging and response control on multimodal treatment of esophageal cancer. World J Surg. 35(3):608-16, 2011 Mar. |
Experimental-Dx |
83 patients |
To discuss the primary staging and response control in multimodal treatment of patients with esophageal carcinoma (EC). |
At primary staging 81 of 83 EC (97.5%) showed an increased SUV uptake correlating with the EUS tumor stage. Suspicious lymph nodes were detected in 51 (61.4%) patients by PET-CT and 66 (79.5%) were detected by EUS. Fifteen patients had additional findings on PET-CT examination leading to a change in therapy in 9 patients (10.3%). Of 50 patients receiving a second PET-CT study, a SUV reduction >50% correlated with major histomorphologic response (tumor regression grade 4, <10% vital tumor cells) and histopathologic response (ypT0 ypN0). Furthermore, these patients showed a significantly increased survival (33.1 ± 3.5 months) compared to non-responders (21.7 ± 3.3 months; p = 0.02) and patients after primary surgery (29 ± 3.2 months; p = 0.05). |
2 |
| 29. Vallbohmer D, Holscher AH, Dietlein M, et al. [18F]-Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography for the assessment of histopathologic response and prognosis after completion of neoadjuvant chemoradiation in esophageal cancer. Ann Surg. 250(6):888-94, 2009 Dec. |
Observational-Dx |
119 patients |
To evaluate the potential of [(18)F]-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) after the completion of neoadjuvant chemoradiation for the assessment of histopathologic response and prognosis in the multimodality treatment of patients with esophageal cancer |
Major histomorphologic response was confirmed as an important prognostic factor (P = 0.005; log-rank test). Neoadjuvant chemoradiation led to a significant reduction of intratumoral FDG-uptake (P = 0.0001). A nonsignificant association was seen between major responders and FDG-PET results (P = 0.056). However, the receiver operating characteristic analysis could not identify a standardized uptake value threshold with a relevant predictive value for histomorphologic response. No significant association between metabolic imaging and prognosis was found. |
2 |
| 30. Elliott JA, O'Farrell NJ, King S, et al. Value of CT-PET after neoadjuvant chemoradiation in the prediction of histological tumour regression, nodal status and survival in oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg. 101(13):1702-11, 2014 Dec. |
Experimental-Dx |
100 patients |
To discuss the role of role of CT-PET after neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) for prediction of pathological response and oncological outcome in oesophageal and junctional adenocarcinoma. |
One hundred consecutive patients with PET-positive OAC were studied. Following nCRT, PET2 identified M1 disease in 2·0 per cent of patients. There were no significant associations between PET2 SUVmax or %?SUVmax with respect to primary tumour stage (ypT) (P = 0.216 and P = 0·975 respectively), tumour regression grade (P = 0·109 and P = 0·232), pCR (P = 0·633 and P = 0·870) or complete resection (R0) (P = 0·440 and P = 0·235). The sensitivity of PET2 for ypN was 10 per cent. %?SUVmax was not associated with disease-free or overall survival (P = 0·162 and P = 0·154 respectively). Of 46 patients with a cMR on PET2, 37 (80 per cent) had histological evidence of residual tumour in the resected specimen, and cMR was not associated with overall survival benefit (P = 0·478). |
2 |
| 31. Piessen G, Petyt G, Duhamel A, Mirabel X, Huglo D, Mariette C. Ineffectiveness of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the evaluation of tumor response after completion of neoadjuvant chemoradiation in esophageal cancer. Ann Surg. 258(1):66-76, 2013 Jul. |
Observational-Dx |
60 patients |
To evaluate the role of ¹8F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in the assessment of tumor response after the completion of neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) in patients with locally advanced resectable esophageal cancer. |
Of 60 total patients, 46 underwent the complete treatment plan (median age: 60.1 years; adenocarcinoma: 25 patients; squamous cell cancer: 21 patients). A major pathological response occurred in 45.7% of patients and was associated with a favorable outcome (P = 0.057). Neoadjuvant CRT led to a significant reduction in intratumoral FDG-uptake (P < 0.001). No significant association was seen between a pathological response (either complete or major) and the FDG-PET results (P > 0.280). The SUV2 value was correlated with a morphological response and the possibility to perform an R0 resection (P < 0.018; receiver operating characteristic curve analysis: SUV2 threshold = 5.5). No significant association was found between metabolic imaging and recurrence or survival. |
2 |
| 32. van Heijl M, Omloo JM, van Berge Henegouwen MI, et al. Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for evaluating early response during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with potentially curable esophageal cancer. Ann Surg 2011;253:56-63. |
Observational-Dx |
100 patients |
To determine whether FDG-PET could differentiate between responding and nonresponding esophageal tumors early in the course of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. |
In 100 included patients, 64 were histopathologic responders. The median SUV decrease 14 days after the start of therapy was 30.9% for histopathologic responders and 1.7% for nonresponders (P = 0.001). In receiver operating characteristic analysis, the area under the curve was 0.71 (95% CI = 0.60-0.82). Using a 0% SUV decrease cutoff value, PET correctly identified 58 of 64 responders (sensitivity 91%) and 18 of 36 nonresponders (specificity 50%). The corresponding positive and negative predictive values were 76% and 75%, respectively. |
2 |
| 33. Kroese TE, Goense L, van Hillegersberg R, et al. Detection of distant interval metastases after neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer with 18F-FDG PET(/CT): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Esophagus. 31(12), 2018 Dec 01. |
Review/Other-Dx |
14 studies |
To systematically review and meta-analyze the diagnostic performance of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET) and 18F-FDG PET/CT for the detection of distant interval metastases after neoadjuvant therapy in patients with esophageal cancer |
Fourteen studies were included comprising a total of 1,110 patients who received baseline staging with 18F-FDG PET(/CT) imaging of whom 1,001 (90%) underwent restaging with 18F-FDG PET(/CT) imaging. Studies were generally of moderate quality. The pooled proportion of patients in whom true distant interval metastases were detected by 18F-FDG PET(/CT) restaging was 8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5-13%). The pooled proportion of patients in whom false positive distant findings were detected by 18F-FDG PET(/CT) restaging was 5% (95% CI: 3-9%). In conclusion,18F-FDG PET(/CT) restaging after neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer detects true distant interval metastases in 8% of patients. Therefore, 18F-FDG PET(/CT) restaging can considerably impact on treatment decision-making. However, false positive distant findings occur in 5% of patients at restaging with 18F-FDG PET(/CT), underlining the need for pathological confirmation of suspe |
4 |
| 34. Heethuis SE, van Rossum PS, Lips IM, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for treatment response assessment in patients with oesophageal cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 120(1):128-35, 2016 07. |
Observational-Dx |
26 patients |
To explore and evaluate the potential value of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the prediction of pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in oesophageal cancer. |
Twelve patients (48%) showed GR of which 8 patients (32%) pCR. Analysis of AUC change throughout treatment, AUCper-pre, was most predictive for GR, at a threshold of 22.7% resulting in a sensitivity of 92%, specificity of 77%, PPV of 79%, and a NPV of 91%. AUCpost-pre was most predictive for pCR, at a threshold of -24.6% resulting in a sensitivity of 83%, specificity of 88%, PPV of 71%, and a NPV of 93%. TTP and slope were not associated with pathologic response. |
2 |
| 35. Sun NN, Liu C, Ge XL, Wang J. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for advanced esophageal cancer response assessment after concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Diagn Interv Radiol. 24(4):195-202, 2018 Jul. |
Observational-Dx |
59 patients |
To evaluate the treatment response of patients with esophageal cancer after concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CRT) using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI). |
Patients with higher T-stage esophageal cancer might present with poorer response. After CRT, the Ktrans and Kep values significantly decreased in the CR group, whereas only Kep value decreased in the non-CR group. The post-Ktrans and post-Kep values were observed to be significantly lower in the CR group than in the non-CR group. The absolute change and ratio of change of both Ktrans and Kep were higher in the CR group than in the non-CR group. Based on ROC analysis, the ratio of change in Ktrans was the best parameter to assess treatment response (AUC= 0.840). |
2 |
| 36. Wang L, Liu L, Han C, et al. The diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) predicts the early response of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma to concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 121(2):246-251, 2016 11. |
Observational-Dx |
38 patients |
To investigate the predictive value of serial diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) on tumor response of the concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and to determine the optimal time point of DWI measurements. |
1) At completion of CCRT, 20 (52.6%) and 18 (47.4%) patients were evaluated as CR and PR, respectively. Over the time points of measures, the series of ADC values (10-3mm2/s) in whole GTV were consistently characterized with higher (all p<0.05) for these CR patients as their means (std) were 2.24 (0.49), 2.23 (0.51), 2.44 (0.57), 2.54 (0.52), 2.70 (0.46), 2.80 (0.55), 2.92 (0.62), compared with these PR patients as 1.83 (0.31), 1.79 (0.21), 1.87 (0.30), 1.97 (0.37), 2.15 (0.44), 2.26 (0.46), 2.32 (0.51), respectively. However, the ADC change rates (?ADC) of two groups were found to be similar. These results were also supported by the multivariate ANOVA analyses. The same analysis results of DWI based GTV volumes were also found. (2) The comparisons of logistic regression analysis indicated that only the ADC values at Week 3 (15 fractions) were an independent prognostic factor of tumor response (OR=0.303, p=0.003). ROC curve analysis showed that Area Under Curve for ADC values of the end of 2nd and 3rd weeks were biggest (0.822) and the prediction efficacy was comparatively optimized. The corresponding cut-off values were 2.11 and 2.14 (10-3mm2/s), respectively. (3) Additional analyses on those eight patients with tumor local recurrence within 1year demonstrated the level-off after the continuously increased ADC values till Week 4. |
2 |
| 37. Wang Z, Guo J, Qin J, et al. Accuracy of 3-T MRI for Preoperative T Staging of Esophageal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy, With Histopathologic Correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 212(4):788-795, 2019 04. |
Observational-Dx |
79 patients. |
To explore the value of 3-T MRI for evaluating the preoperative T staging of esophageal cancer (EC) treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), with histopathologic confirmation. |
The study included 79 patients. Mean time between NAC and MRI was 23 days. Interreader agreements of T category assignment were excellent for T2-weighted TSE BLADE (? = 0.810, p < 0.0001), contrast-enhanced StarVIBE (? = 0.845, p < 0.0001), high-resolution delayed phase StarVIBE (? = 0.897, p < 0.0001), and the combination of the three sequences (? = 0.880, p < 0.0001). The highest accuracy for T0, T1, T2, and T4a lesions was on high-resolution delayed phase StarVIBE (96.2%, 92.4%, 91.1%, and 91.1% for reader 1; 94.9%, 89.9%, 91.1%, and 94.9% for reader 2), and the highest accuracy for T3 lesions was on T2-weighted TSE BLADE (92.4% and 94.9% for reader 1 and reader 2, respectively). Diagnostic accuracy of the combination of the three sequences was not improved compared with individual sequences. |
2 |
| 38. Kato H, Miyazaki T, Nakajima M, Fukuchi M, Manda R, Kuwano H. Value of positron emission tomography in the diagnosis of recurrent oesophageal carcinoma. Br J Surg 2004;91:1004-9. |
Observational-Dx |
55 patients |
To compare the ability of FDG-PET and CT to diagnose recurrent oesophageal carcinoma. |
Twenty-seven of the 55 patients had recurrent disease in a total of 37 organs. Locoregional recurrence was observed in 19 patients (35 per cent). Distant recurrent disease occurred in 15 patients (27 per cent) in 18 organs. Six patients had recurrence in the liver, four in the lung, six in bone and two in distant lymph nodes. FDG-PET showed 96 per cent sensitivity, 68 per cent specificity and 82 per cent accuracy in demonstrating recurrent disease. The corresponding values for CT were 89, 79 and 84 per cent. The sensitivity of FDG-PET was higher than that of CT in detecting locoregional recurrence, but its specificity was lower because of FDG uptake in the gastric tube and thoracic lymph nodes. In distant organs the sensitivity of PET in detecting lung metastasis was lower than that of CT, but its sensitivity for bone metastasis was higher. |
2 |
| 39. Teyton P, Metges JP, Atmani A, et al. Use of positron emission tomography in surgery follow-up of esophageal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 13(3):451-8, 2009 Mar. |
Observational-Dx |
41 patients |
To compare the ability of FDG-PET and conventional imaging to detect early recurrence of esophageal cancer after initial surgery in asymptomatic patients. |
Twenty-three patients had recurrent disease (56%), mostly within the first 6 months after surgery (70%). Despite two false-positive scans due to postoperative changes, FDG-PET was more accurate than CT (91% vs. 81%, p = 0.02) for the detection of recurrence with a sensitivity of 100% (vs. 65%), a specificity of 85% (vs. 91%), and a negative predictive value of 100% on a patient-by-patient-based analysis. For the detection of locoregional recurrence, FDG-PET was more accurate than CT (96.2% vs. 88.9%). FDG-PET was also more accurate than CT for the detection of distant metastases (92.5% vs. 84.9%), especially when involving either bones (100%) or liver (98.1%). A lower sensitivity of FDG-PET (57%) for the early detection of small lung metastases did not affect patient management (accuracy = 92.5%). |
2 |
| 40. Antonowicz SS, Lorenzi B, Parker M, Tang CB, Harvey M, Kadirkamanathan SS. Annual computed tomography scans do not improve outcomes following esophagectomy for cancer: a 10-year UK experience. Dis Esophagus. 28(4):365-70, 2015 May-Jun. |
Review/Other-Dx |
169 patients |
The aim of this study was to evaluate whether our annual routine computed tomography (aCT) scan program changes outcomes. |
The primary outcome measure was survival. Recurrence was detected in 61 cases (36%). aCT scan diagnosed recurrence in only a minority of cases (17 cases, 28%). In the majority of patients, clinical evidence prompted an unplanned CT scan (uCT; 44 cases, 72%). There was no difference in unadjusted survival between the two groups (hazard ratio = 0.61, 95% confidence interval 0.34-1.08, P = 0.090), nor was one more likely to receive secondary oncological treatment (aCT 41% vs. uCT 44%, P = 1.000). When we adjusted survival patterns for confounding covariates, the uCT cohort showed a protective effect (hazard ratio = 0.54, 95% confidence interval 0.28-0.98, P = 0.042). These data suggest that aCT scans do not influence management or survival after esophagectomy. A consensus follow-up protocol for patients treated for esophageal cancer remains to be established. |
4 |
| 41. Betancourt Cuellar SL, Palacio DP, Wu CC, et al. 18FDG-PET/CT is useful in the follow-up of surgically treated patients with oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Br J Radiol. 91(1082):20170341, 2018 Feb. |
Observational-Dx |
162 patients |
The purpose of this study was to evaluate fludeoxyglucose-positron emission ;tomography/CT's (FDG-PET/CT) performance in the follow ;up of patients with surgically treated oesophageal adenocarcinoma. |
Recurrence occurred in 71 (43%) patients, usually within the first year following surgery (60%) and in more than one site (76%). The sensitivity, specificity, positive-predictive value, negative-predictive value and accuracy of FDG-PET/CT for anastomotic recurrence were 77, 76, 16, 98 and 76%; for regional nodal recurrence were 88, 85, 43, 97 and 86%; and for distant metastatic recurrence were: 97, 96, 91, 99 and 96%. In 5 of the 42 patients (12%) with distant metastases, the metastatic sites were outside the area covered by a conventional follow-up chest-abdomen CT and in 4 patients (9%) metastases were barely perceptible on the CT component of the FDG-PET/CT and consequently were unlikely to be detected without the aid of the FDG uptake. |
2 |
| 42. Goense L, van Rossum PS, Reitsma JB, et al. Diagnostic Performance of 18F-FDG PET and PET/CT for the Detection of Recurrent Esophageal Cancer After Treatment with Curative Intent: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. [Review]. J Nucl Med. 56(7):995-1002, 2015 Jul. |
Review/Other-Dx |
8 studies |
To assess the diagnostic performance of (18)F-FDG PET and integrated (18)F-FDG PET/CT for diagnosing recurrent esophageal cancer after initial treatment with curative intent. |
Eight eligible studies were included for meta-analysis, comprising 486 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent (18)F-FDG PET or PET/CT after previous treatment with curative intent. The quality of the included studies assessed by the QUADAS-2 tool was considered reasonable; there were few concerns with regard to the risk of bias and applicability. Integrated (18)F-FDG PET/CT and standalone (18)F-FDG PET were used in 4 and 3 studies, respectively. One other study analyzed both modalities separately. In 4 studies, (18)F-FDG PET or PET/CT was performed as part of routine follow-up, whereas in 4 other studies the diagnostic test was performed on indication during clinical follow-up. Pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity for (18)F-FDG PET and PET/CT in diagnosing recurrent esophageal cancer were 96% (95% confidence interval, 93%-97%) and 78% (95% confidence interval, 66%-86%), respectively. Subgroup analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in diagnostic accuracy according to type of PET scanner (standalone PET vs. integrated PET/CT) or indication of scanning (routine follow-up vs. on indication). |
4 |
| 43. Sharma P, Jain S, Karunanithi S, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT for detection of suspected recurrence in patients with oesophageal carcinoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 41(6):1084-92, 2014 Jun. |
Observational-Dx |
180 patients |
To evaluate the role of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in the detection of recurrence in patients with oesophageal carcinoma, suspected clinically or following conventional investigations. |
Of the 227 (18)F-FDG PET/CT studies,166 were positive and 61 were negative for recurrent disease. PET/CT showed local recurrence in 134, nodal recurrence in 115 and distant recurrence in 47, with more than one site of recurrence in 34. The PET/CT findings were true-positive in 153 studies, true-negative in 54, false-positive in 13 and false-negative in 7. The sensitivity of (18)F-FDG PET/CT was 96%, the specificity was 81%, the positive and negative predictive values were 92% and 89%, respectively, and the accuracy was 91%. PET/CT showed similar accuracy in patients with squamous cell carcinoma and in those with adenocarcinoma (P = 0.181).(18)F-FDG PET/CT was more specific than CECT (67% vs. 21%; P < 0.0001). PET/CT was superior to CECT for the detection of nodal recurrence (P < 0.0001), but not local recurrence (P = 0.093) or distant metastases (P = 0.441). |
2 |
| 44. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Radiation Dose Assessment Introduction. Available at: https://www.acr.org/-/media/ACR/Files/Appropriateness-Criteria/RadiationDoseAssessmentIntro.pdf. |
Review/Other-Dx |
N/A |
To provide evidence-based guidelines on exposure of patients to ionizing radiation. |
No abstract available. |
4 |
